Search Results

"I am convinced that this war, for the great masses of the countries of Europe, and not for our own country alone, is no people's war. It is a war that has been made—I am not referring to our Leaders here—by men in high places, by diplomatists working in secret, by bureaucrats who are out of touch with the peoples of the world who are the remnant of an older evil civilisation which is disappearing by gradual and peaceful methods. I want to make an appeal on behalf of the people, who are voiceless except in this House, that there should be a supreme effort made to save this terrible wreckage of human life, that we may not make this further sacrifice upon the altar of the terrible, bloodstained idol of the balance of power, but should be willing to make great sacrifices of patience in the sacred cause of peace." Parliament Debate Hansard Germany and Belgium August 3rd 1914 Vol 65 cc1839 Mr. Edmund Harvey "I believe we are going to war now because of the fear and jealousy entertained in this country unfortunately, and fostered by large sections of the Press—the fear and jealousy of German ambition. I believe that is the real reason why hon. Gentlemen opposite are asking this country to go to war, and I do not think there would be any war fever in the country except for the demands made by the Party opposite and their supporters in the Press "Parliament Debate Hansard Germany and Belgium August 3rd 1914 Vol 65 cc1836, Mr Phillip Morrel "I believe I am justified in saying it is abundantly clear that it is this fear of Germany which is to-day driving us to war. I ask myself whether we have not in times past suffered enough, paid enough treasure, and paid enough of the blood of the subjects of this country in order to preserve what John Bright once called that "foul fetish—the balance of power in Europe." I ask myself, too, whether we now can be sure we shall preserve that balance of power." Parliament Debate Hansard Germany and Belgium August 3rd 1914 Vol 65 cc1836, Mr Phillip Morrel "they have brought us to the brink of disaster without our knowing, and without our being warned. I say that, at the last moment, they should give the people of this country a chance to decide. This is a continuation of that old and disastrous system where a few men in charge of the State, wielding the whole force of the State, make secret engagements and secret arrangements, carefully veiled from the knowledge of the people, who are as dumb driven cattle without a voice on the 1852 question. And nobody can tell the country what are the important considerations that ought to weigh with us in taking part in this tremendous struggle." Parliamentary Debate Hansard War in Europe 3rd of August 1914 vol 65 cc1851 Mr Percy Molento "I am justified in saying it is abundantly clear that it is this fear of Germany which is to-day driving us to war. I ask myself whether we have not in times past suffered enough, paid enough treasure, and paid enough of the blood of the subjects of this country in order to preserve what John Bright once called that "foul fetish—the balance of power in Europe." I ask myself, too, whether we now can be sure we shall preserve that balance of power." Parliament Debate Hansard Germany and Belgium August 3rd 1914 Vol 65 cc1836, Mr Phillip Morrel "The right hon. Gentleman said very little about Russia. Let us remember that in going to war in this way we are going to war just as much to preserve the despotism of Russia as to interfere with German ambition. For my part, although I have no particular love for the German Empire, or for German methods, I have still less love for Russia or Russian methods. Without engaging in a war to support despotism, in my opinion it is perfectly possible for the right hon. Gentleman and the Government to arrange an honourable neutrality with Germany, a neutrality which would be perfectly honourable to this country. I regret very much the policy we are pursuing. I regret it still more because I think the country is being rushed into war without its knowledge. No one a week ago could have foreseen that we were going to take a step like this. After listening to the right hon. Gentleman and the reasons he has given, while we must admit the strength of his speech and its sincerity, I say I do not believe he has given a sufficient reason for our undertaking at this time, here and now, the terrible peril and danger of involving this country in war." Parliament Debate Hansard Germany and Belgium August 3rd 1914 Vol 65 cc1836, Mr Phillip Morrel "Everyone in the West told me we do not have any chance of NATO EU membership, I asked them not to try the Ukrainian people into a corner, because our people are brave and the West should also be brave in telling directly to the Ukrainian people, that well you are not going to be NATO EU member. They did not have a consolidated position and I requested this personally. I requested them personally to try to say directly that we are going to accept you into NATO or NATO in a year or two or five. Just say it directly and clearly or just say no. And the response was very clear. You're not going to be a NATO EU member, but publicly the doors will remain open" On GPS: Could Ukraine have averted war by abandoning its NATO quest? Fareed Zakaria Interview with Ukraine President Zelensky on joining NATO CNN 20th of March 2022 - Twitter Minute 2:40 "Whatever attitude one chooses toward this condition, it remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons—a trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million—who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world." Edward Bernays The Father of PR and Propaganda Nephew of Sigmund Freud Propaganda 1928 Page 9-10 "If Saddam Hussein did not exist, we would have to invent him.... The end of Saddam Hussein would be the end of the anti-Saddam coalition. Nothing destroys an alliance like the disappearance of the enemy... Maintaining a long-term American presence in the gulf would be difficult in the absence of a regional threat" Thank goodness For A Villain Newsweek Sept 16th 1996 By Fareed Zakaria (CNN, CFR TC) "But it is well known that many of these leaders are themselves led, sometimes by persons whose names are known to few… A presidential candidate may be “drafted” in response to “overwhelming popular demand,” but it is well known that his name may be decided upon by half a dozen men sitting around a table in a hotel room.", Edward Bernays The Father of PR and Propaganda Nephew of Sigmund Freud Propaganda 1928 Page 33-34 "Political campaigns to-day are all side shows, all honors, all bombast, glitter, and speeches. These are for the most part unrelated to the main business of studying the public scientifically, of supplying the public with party, candidate, platform, and performance, and selling the public these ideas and products." Edward Bernays The Father of PR and Propaganda Nephew of Sigmund Freud Propaganda 1928 Page 94-95 "The conscious manipulation of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country." Edward Bernays The Father of PR and Propaganda Nephew of Sigmund Freud Propaganda 1928 Page 9 "The successful businessman today apes the politician. He has adopted the glitter and the ballyhoo of the campaign. He has set up all the sideshows. He has annual dinners that are a compendium of speeches, flags, bombast, stateliness, pseudo-democracy slightly tinged with paternalism. On occasion he doles out honors to employees, much as the republic of classic times rewarded its worthy citizens. But these are merely the sideshows, the drums, of big business, by which it builds up an image of public service, and of honorary service. This is but one of the methods by which business stimulates loyal enthusiasms on the part of directors, the workers, the stockholders and the consumer public. It is one of the methods by which big business performs its function of making and selling products to the public." Edward Bernays The Father of PR and Propaganda Nephew of Sigmund Freud Propaganda 1928 Page 93-94 "The society of experts will control propaganda and education. It will teach loyalty to the world government, and make nationalism high treason. The government, being an oligarchy, will instill submissiveness into the great bulk of the population…It is possible that it may invent ingenious ways of concealing its own power, leaving the forms of democracy intact, and allowing the plutocrats or politicians to imagine that they are cleverly controlling these forms…whatever the outward forms may be, all real power will come to be concentrated in the hands of those who understand the art of scientific manipulation" The Scientific Outlook By Bertrand Russell Page 243-44 "The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy." Carroll Quigley Tragedy and Hope Page 1247-1248 "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson The New Freedom Page 13-14 "I saw that his own mind was made up. He had been greatly impressed, as Lord Milner told me afterwards, by an interview with Colonel Thompson of the American Red Cross, who had just returned from Russia and who had denounced in blunt language the folly of the Allies in not opening up negotiations with the Bolsheviks.... Three days later all my doubts were put at rest. I was to go to Russia as head of a special mission to establish unofficial relations with the Bolsheviks.... Lord Milner I saw almost daily. Five days before my departure I dined alone with him at Brook's. He was in his most inspiring mood. He talked to me with a charming frankness about the war, about the future of England, about his own career, and about the opportunities of youth— He was, too, very far from being the Jingo and the Conservative reactionary whom popular opinion at one time represented him to be. On the contrary, many of his views on society were startlingly modern. He believed in the highly organized state, in which service, efficiency, and hard work were more important than titles or money-bags" Bruce Lockhart British Agent Page 200, 201, 206 "Another new acquaintance of these first days in the Bolshevized St Petersburg was Raymond Robins, the head of the American Red Cross Mission.... He had been a leading figure in Roosevelt's "Bull Moose" campaign for the American Presidency in 1912. Although a rich man himself, he was an anti-capitalist.... Hitherto, his two heroes had been Roosevelt and Cecil Rhodes. Now Lenin had captured his imagination.... Robins was the only man whom Lenin was always willing to see and who ever succeeded in imposing his own personality on the unemotional Bolshevik leader. In a less official sense Robins had a similar mission to my own. He was the intermediary between the Bolsheviks and the American Government and had set himself the task of persuading President Wilson to recognize the Soviet regime." British Agent Bruce Lockhart Page 222-223 "You will hear it said that I am an agent of Wall Street; that I am the servant of William B. Thompson to get Altai Copper for him; that I have already got 500,000 acres of the best timber land in Russia for myself; that I have already copped off the Trans-Siberian Railway; that they have given me a monopoly of the platinum in Russia; that this explains my working for the soviet.... You will hear that talk Now, I do not think it is true, Commissioner, but let us assume it is true. Let us assume that I am here to capture Russia for Wall Street and American business men. Let us assume that you are a British wolf and I am an American wolf, and that when this war is over we are going to eat each other up for the Russian market; let us do so in perfectly frank, man fashion, but let us assume at the same time that we are fairly intelligent wolves, and that we know that if we do not hunt together in this hour the German wolf will eat us both up." U.S. Cong., Senate, Bolshevik Propaganda, Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, 65th Cong., 1919, p. 802. "Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet: ‘His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours for the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.’ I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation. Yours sincerely, Arthur James Balfour " The Balfour Declaration To Lord Walter Rothschild November 2nd 1917 "The British were so matter-of-factly helpful that they became a participant in internal American deliberations, to a degree probably never before practiced between sovereign nations. In my period in office, the British played a seminal role in certain American bilateral negotiations … In my White House incarnation then, I kept the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did the American State Department" Henry Kissinger on May 10, 1982, before the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London, Source CIA FOIA Page 8 "Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein" The Project For A New American Century Page 14 "The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed. It will have become a great world movement as widespread and evident as socialism or communism. It will have taken the place of these movements very largely. It will be more than they were, it will be frankly a world religion. This large, loose assimilatory mass of movements, groups, and societies will be definitely and obviously attempting to swallow up the entire population of the world and become the new human community." The Open Conspiracy and Other Writings" by H.G. Wells. Page, or on Scribd Page 50-51 "And the builder of this new world must be education. Education alone can lay the foundations on which the building is to rest. On this point a kind of consensus has been reached by those who trust the future of international co-operation and those who refuse to believe in it. When the latter go about repeating that to succeed in such a task one would have to change human nature, they do but exaggerate the acknowledged need for a gradual and patient reshaping of the public mind. There is a great work to be achieved, and no men can forward it but those who are well informed as to the conditions and needs of our times, in as much as all countries and all races are concerned. Even the efforts of such men would be in vain unless, in a world of democracy, they were backed by a body of opinion ever growing more enlightened and more powerful. How can a well-prepared élite be raised throughout the world t o spread its influence over the masses, who can then support them in their turn? Here we encounter the real problem, and it is essentially a problem of education." John Harley Paul Mantoux foreword to international understanding Page IX "This brings us to another important, and basic, function of the United Nations. And that is its role in creating a global consensus about what is right and what is wrong" The UN, the U.S. and the World Ambassador Madeleine K. Albright, Permanent Representative from the U.S. to the United Nations, speaking at the Town Meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, September 12, 1996. "Despite the fact that the money is returned almost immediately to torpor ions that are members of the corporatocracy (the creditor), the recipient country is required to pay it all back, principal plus interest. If an EHM is completely successful, the loans are so large that the debtor is forced to default on its payments after a few years. When this happens, then like the Mafia we demand our pound of flesh. This often includes one or more of the following : control over United Nations votes, the installation of military bases, or access to precious resources such as oil or the Panama Canal . Of course, the debtor still owes us the money—and another country is added to our global empire." John Perkins, Confessions Of An Economic Hitman Page XVII "First, I was to justify huge international loans that would funnel money back to MAIN and other U.S. companies through massive engineering and construction projects. Second, I would work to bankrupt the countries that received those loans so that they would be forever beholden to their creditors, and so they would present easy targets when we needed favors, including military bases, U N votes, or access to oil and other natural resources." John Perkins, Confessions Of An Economic Hitman Page 15 "I want to make it very clear : the destabilization campaign launched by the United States in 1986, ending with the 1989 Panama invasion, was a result of the U.S. rejection of any scenario in which future control of the Panama Canal might be in the hands of an independent, sovereign Panama— supported by Japan. . . Shultz and Weinberger, meanwhile, masquerading as officials operating in the public interest and basking in popular ignorance about the powerful economic interests they represented, were building a propaganda campaign to shoot me down" America's prisoner : the memoirs of Manuel Noriega by Manuel Noriega, Peter Einser Page 56-7 "The book described how "relations between Bush and Perot had gone downhill ever since the vice president had asked Ross Perot how his POW/MIA investigations were going. 'Well, George, I go in looking for prisoners,' said Perot, 'but I spend all my time discovering the government has been moving drugs around the world and is involved in illegal arms deals. . . I can't get at the prisoners because of the corruption among our own people.'" The Washington Post April 18th 1982 "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, ship building and powder interests and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press in the United States… These 12 men worked the problems out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." Oscar Callway congressman*Type U.S. Congressional Record February 9, 1917, page 2947 and download PDF from GPO.GOV "Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention." Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, Page. 76, translated from the original in French by William Blum "is becoming an unofficial instrument of international policy, taking up here and there the ends and threads of international problems and questions which the government find it difficult to handle, and through private initiative reaching conclusions which are not of a formal nature but which unofficially find their way into the policies of governments" The Reece Committee Page 177, or on Scribd Page 177/1651 The Carnegie Endowment 1934 Report "I have the very definite feeling that these various foundations you mention very definitely do exercise both overt and covert influences on our foreign relations and that their influences are counter to the fundamental principles on which this nation was founded and which have made it great" The Reece Committee Page 169 a letter from Spurille Braden Former assistant secretary of state to the committee, or on Scribd Page 1183/1193 "The far-reaching power of the large foundations and of the interlock, has so influenced the press, the radio, and even the government that it has become extremely difficult for objective criticism of foundation practices to get into news channel without having first been distorted, slanted, discredited, and at times ridiculed. Nothing short of an unhampered Congressional investigation could hope to bring out the vital facts; and the pressure against Congressional investigation has been almost incredible. As indicated by their arrogance in dealing with this Committee, the major foundations and their associated intermediary organizations have intrenched themselves behind a totality of power which presumes to place them beyond serious criticism and attack." Foundations Their Influence and Power Page 303 By Rene Wormser "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson" Franklin D. Roosevelt November 21st 1933 to Edward Mandela House, FDRs Personal Letters 1928-45, Page 373 "[E]veryone knows how fraternity brothers can help other brothers climb the ladder of life. If you want to make foreign policy, there's no better fraternity to belong to than the Council. When Henry Stimson - the group's quintessential member - went to Washington in 1940 as Secretary of War, he took with him John McCloy, who was to become Assistant Secretary in charge of personnel. McCloy has recalled: "Whenever we needed a man we thumbed through the roll of the Council members and put through a call to New York." And over the years, the men McCloy called in turn called other Council members." NYT 1971 Nov 21st Anthony Lukas "This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth .... When the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized .... The money power overawes the legislative and executive forces of the Nation and of the States. I have seen these forces exerted during the different stages of this bill .... This is the Aldrich bill in disguise" Congressional Record, December 22, 1913, Vol. 51, p. 1446. Page 122 "For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the U.S.A. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political "ammunition," as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people - and thus paid off and retained his internationalist political support." Curtis Dall My Exploited Father In Law FDR Page 185 "We Republicans in the West want to know if Wall Street, the utilities, and the international bankers control our party and can select our candidate? I believe I am serving the best interests of the Republican Party by protesting in advance and exposing the machinations and attempts of J. P. Morgan and the New York utility bankers in forcing Wendell Willkie on the Republican Party .... There is nothing to the Willkie boom for President except the artificial public opinion being created by newspapers, magazines, and the radio. The reason back of all this is money. Money is being spent by someone, and lots of it." 86 Cong. Rec - June 19, 1940 Part 8 Page 8641 'To the contrary, Castro could not have seized power in Cuba without the aid of the United States. American Government agencies and the United States press played a major role in bringing Castro to power.... As the U.S. Ambassador to Cuba during the Castro-Communist revolution of 1957-59, I had first-hand knowledge of the facts which brought about the rise of Fidel Castro .... The State Department consistently intervened - positively, negatively, and by innuendo - to bring about the downfall of President Fulgencio Batista, thereby making it possible for Fidel Castro to take over the Government of Cuba." NYT 26th of September 1979 Former US Ambassador to Cuba E. T Smith “David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski found Jimmy Carter to be their ideal candidate. They helped him win the nomination and the presidency. To accomplish this purpose, they mobilized the money power of the Wall Street bankers, the intellectual influence of the academic community - which is subservient to the wealth of the great tax-free foundations - and the media controllers represented in the membership of the CFR and the Trilateral" Senator Barry Goldwater With No Apologies Page 286 "A. having regard to the revelation by several European governments of the existence for 40 years of a clandestine intelligence and armed operations organization in several Member States of the Community, B. whereas for over 40 years this organization has eluded all democratic controls and has been run by the secret services of the states concerned in collaboration with NATO. C. fearing the danger that such clandestine networks may have interfered illegally in the internal political affairs of Member States or may still do so. D. whereas in certain Member States military secret services (or uncontrolled branches thereof) were involved in serious cases of terrorism and crime as evidenced by various judicial inquiries. E. whereas these organizations operated and continue to operate completely outside the law since they are not subject to any parliamentary control and frequently those holding the highest government and constitutional posts have claimed to be in the dark as to these matters. F. whereas the various 'GLADIO' organizations have at their disposal independent arsenals and military resources which give them an unknown strike potential, thereby jeopardizing the democratic structures of the countries in which they are operating or have been operating, G. greatly concerned at the existence of decision-making and operational bodies which are not subject to any form of democratic control and are of a completely clandestine nature at a time when greater Community cooperation in the field of security is a constant subject of discussion." The European Parliament November 22nd 1990 Page 16 PDF Wiki "Paulo Taviani, Italian Defence Minister from 1955 to 1958 The Italian secret services were bossed and financed by 'the boys in Via Veneto', i.e. the CIA in the US embassy in the heart of Rome" 18th Of November 1990 The Observer "This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist" Eisenhower’s Farewell Address to the Nation, January 17, 1961

Boris Johnson's sister, Rachael Johnson, writes an article for the Spectator, saying she pities Ghislaine Maxwell! Not only does she feel pity for an on trial sex trafficker and longtime right hand woman of Jeffery Epstein, she also says her and Boris knew her, from their times at Oxford. Could you be any more in a bubble, than to pity such repugnant people, to any normal human being. Why would you shine a light on this relationship and even write an article yourself about it? It is completely bizarre, start to finish. "It’s hard not to feel a batsqueak of pity for Ghislaine Maxwell — 500 days and counting in solitary confinement" Rachel Johnson - It’s hard not to pity Ghislaine Maxwell We met briefly at Oxford 17 November 2021 Ghislaine Maxwell The Guardian - Ghislaine Maxwell sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking crimes Tue 28 Jun 2022 By Victoria Bekiempis in New York

"Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - One World, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it" Memoirs by David Rockefeller Page 482 or 405 “We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”—CFR member James Paul Warburg before the Revision of the United Nations Charter: Hearings Before the United States Senate Committee On Foreign Relations 81st Congress second session 1950 Page 494 "1944, Bretton Woods: The IMF and the World Bank 1945, San Francisco: The United Nations 1994, Marrakech: The World Trade Organization. History knows where it is going.... The World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." 1994 April 15th NYT A19 "But what about epidemics? How many doctors do we have for it, how many airplanes, tents, scientists? If there were such a thing as a world government, we would be better prepared." Bill Gates January 28, 2015, Bill Gates Interview With Süddeutschen Zeitung “The house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.” CFR member Richard Gardner, Page 558 Foreign Affairs The Hard Road To World Order "The hopeful aspect of the present situation is that even as nations resist appeals for "world government" and "the surrender of sovereignty," technological, economic and political interests are forcing them to establish more and more far-reaching arrangements to manage their mutual interdependence" CFR member Richard Gardner, Page 559 Foreign Affairs The Hard Road To World Order "Thus, while we will not see "world government" in the old-fashioned sense of a single all-embracing global authority, key elements of planetary planning and planetary management will come about on those very specific problems where the facts of interdependence force nations, in their enlightened self-interest, to abandon unilateral decision-making in favor of multilateral processes." Richard Gardner, Page 563 Foreign Affairs The Hard Road To World Order "The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak" A World In Ferment Interpretations Of The War For A New World Page 106 Nicholas Murray Butler President of The Carnegie Endowment for international peace "I suggest a radical alternative scheme for the next century: the creation of a common currency for all of the industrial democracies, with a common monetary policy and a joint Bank of Issue to determine that monetary policy.... How can independent states accomplish that? They need to turn over the determination of monetary policy to a supranational body" Richard N Cooper Foreign Affairs Fall 1984 A Monetary System For The Future "In the almost fifty years that have elapsed since 1943, I joined the World Federalists and campaigned for world government; I was appointed by President Robert M. Hutchins of the University of Chicago to his Committee to Frame a World Constitution, established by him immediately after atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; I conducted a seminar for the Ford Foundation on war and peace, world peace, and world government in 1951; and I wrote two books (The Common Sense of Politics, 1971, and A Vision of the Future, 1984), in which these subjects are treated with a maturity acquired by years of thinking about them.... Finally, in Section 5, I will close with a vision of the new world of the Twentieth Century, in which the conflict between the two great superpowers—the USA and its NATO allies vs. the USSR and its Warsaw Pact satellites—will be replaced by the USDR (a union of socialist democratic republics). This will be a penultimate stage of progress toward a truly global world federal union that will eliminate the remaining potentially threatening conflict between the have and the have-not nations." Haves without have-nots Mortimer Alder 286-287 on Scribd “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.” Strobe Talbot, Deputy Secretary of State, TIME, July l992 Wiki Quote "Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind so long as it remains divided into fifty or sixty independent states … Equally obviously there is going to be no steady progress in civilization or self-government among the more backward peoples until some kind of international system is created which will put an end to the diplomatic struggles incident to the attempt of every nation to make itself secure... The real problem today is that of world government?" 1922 Phillip Kerr From Empire to Commonwealth, Foreign Relations Page 97-98 "The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind, that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education" 1944 Council publication, American Public Opinion and Postwar Security Commitments Page 4 "The viewpoint of the Establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the "one-world" view by its critics. The phrase is no longer fashionable among sophisticates; yet, the phrase "one-world"is still apt because nothing has changed in the minds and actions of those promoting policies consistent with its fundamental tenets. Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power .... In this point of view, the activities of international financial and industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world design - with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as its centerpiece - into being." Senator Jesse Helms December 15th 1987 Vol 133 Page 18146 Congressional Hearing (35614 at top left of page) "For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the U.S.A. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political "ammunition," as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people - and thus paid off and retained his internationalist political support." Curtis Fall My Exploited Father In Law FDR Page 185 "But the Atlantic Pact (NATO) need not be our last effort toward greater unity. It can be converted into one more sound and important step working toward world peace. It can be one of the most positive moves in the direction of One World" The Goal Is Governed Of All the World pamphlet quotes CFR Member Elmo Roper congressional hearing June 20th 1966 Page 76 PDF Page 13, I got PDF sent through ACU Library "The society of experts will control propaganda and education. It will teach loyalty to the world government, and make nationalism high treason. The government, being an oligarchy, will instill submissiveness into the great bulk of the population…It is possible that it may invent ingenious ways of concealing its own power, leaving the forms of democracy intact, and allowing the plutocrats or politicians to imagine that they are cleverly controlling these forms…whatever the outward forms may be, all real power will come to be concentrated in the hands of those who understand the art of scientific manipulation" Bertrand Russell, The Scientific Outlook Page 243-44 “Some dilution…of the sovereignty system as it prevails in the world today must take place…to the immediate disadvantage of those nations which now possess the preponderance of power…The United States must be prepared to make sacrifices…in setting up a world politico-economic order.”—CFR member John Foster Dulles 29th October 1939 NYT "The implications for education are clear and imperative: (a) the efficient functioning of the emerging economy and the full utilization of its potentialities require profound changes in the attitudes and outlook of the American people, especially the rising generation—a complete and frank recognition that the old order is passing, that the new order is emerging" The American Historical Association “Investigation of the Social Studies in the Schools,” 1934 Page 34-35 "In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisers to government and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the pune. The net result of there combined efforts has been to promote "internationalism" in a particular sense a form directed toward "world Government" have supported a conscious distortion of history propagandized blindly for the United Nations as the hope of the world, supported that organization's agencies to an extent beyond general public acceptance, and leaned toward a generally "leftist" approach to international problems." Rene Wormser Foundations Their Influence and Power Page 305 "The call now is for the utmost capitalization of the discontent manifest among teachers for the benefit of revolutionary social goals. This means that all available energies radically inclined leaders within the profession should be directed, toward the building of a united radical front. Warm collectivistic sentiment and intelligent vision, propagated in clever and disturbing manner by a few individual leaders no longer suits the occasion" The Reece committee, Page 145, Or on Scribd Page 487/491 from a 1934 article in The Progressive Education Magazine, "the Educator, The New Deal and Revolution" Professor Norman Woelfel "The challenge of the future is to make this world one world — a world truly free to engage in common and constructive intellectual efforts that will serve the welfare of mankind everywhere." 1946 Rockefeller Foundation Report Page 8-9, published online by them and able to download in PDF form "The weight of evidence before this Committee, which the foundations have made no serious effort to rebut, indicates that the form of globalism which the foundations have so actively promoted and from which our foreign policy has suffered seriously, relates definitely to a collectivist point of view. Despite vehement disclaimers of bias, despite platitudinous affirmations of loyalty to American traditions, the statements filed by those foundations whose operations touch on foreign policy have produced no rebuttal to the evidence of support of collectivism" The Reece Committee Page 169 or on Scribd Page 169/1643 "It is hardly necessary to emphasize that an interest of this kind involves no narrow nationalistic aim. The culture of the one world in the making is necessarily compounded of the diverse contributions of many peoples." The Rockefeller Foundation 1946 report Page 36, published online by them and able to download in PDF form "Then a new world order would encompass all regions of the globe; shared values and goals would render conditions within states more humane" Henry Kissinger, World Order Page 271 "In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last" Zbibnigew Brzezinski The Grand Chessboard Page 209 "A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a new world order -- can emerge: A new era -- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony." Bush NWO 11th of September 1990 speech, Toward A New World Order "Dreamed of a world-wide brotherhood with the background of a common race and creed, consecrated to the service of peace… It was a humanitarian and international; we be believed that we were laying the basis of a federation of the world" John Buchan, Pilgrims Way Page 120-121 "If we are frank with ourselves, we shall admit that we are engaged on a deliberate and sustained and concentrated effort to impose limitations upon the sovereignty and independence of the fifty or sixty local sovereign independent States which at present partition the habitable surface of the earth and divide the political allegiance of mankind. It is just because we are really attacking the principle of local sovereignty that we keep on protesting our loyalty to it so loudly. The harder we press our attack upon the idol, the more pains we take to keep its priests and devotees in a fool’s paradise—lapped in a false sense of security which will inhibit them from taking up arms in their idol’s defense. The local national state, invested with the attributes of sovereignty — is an abomination of desolation standing in the place where it ought not. It has stood in that place now — demanding and receiving human sacrifices from its poor deluded votaries — for four or five centuries. Our political task in our generation is to cast the abomination out, to cleanse the temple and to restore the worship of the divinity to whom the temple rightfully belongs. In plain terms, we have to re-transfer the prestige and the prerogatives of sovereignty from the fifty or sixty fragments of contemporary society to the whole of contemporary society — from the local national states by which sovereignty has been usurped, with disastrous consequences, for half a millennium, to some institution embodying our society as a whole. I will hereby repeat that we are at present working discreetly but with all of our might to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands"- Arnold J Toynbee Page 25 "is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system.... the vital first step for a new kind of community of nations." Henry Kissinger, With NAFTA US Finally Creates A New World Order La Times July 18th 1993 "The creation of an international mind with a world conscience and a world patriotism" The New World Order Samuel Zane Batten 1919 Page 13 "Our course is clear. " The unlimited independence of sovereign states is as impossible and undesirable as the anarchical freedom of individual citizens." The New World Order Samuel Zane Batten 1919 Page 135 "In a word, by principles of international morality, by international law, and by international trade we must create a presumption in favor of world federation" The New World Order Samuel Zane Batten 1919 Page 137 "There must be a league of free nations, a federation of the world. In this direction several things may be noted. There must be a world parliament made up representatives of the nations, to consider questions of common interest, to frame international laws, and to interpret world justice. There must be an international' court to interpret international law and decide all questions that arise between nations and, states according to accepted principles and laws. Any nation feeling itself wronged may submit its case to this court for adjudication; and no nation shall be free to attack another till its case has been heard, c there must also be an international police force large and strong enough to enforce international law against any offending member. This international police force should possess an army and navy stronger than that of any member; in fact it should be the only army and navy in existence" The New World Order Samuel Zane Batten 1919 Page 125

Dana Stroul, a US Official speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), discusses how they can use leverage over the Syrian Regime in 2019. She says how the US army "owns" a third of Syrian territory in the northeast of the country, which also happens to be the "economic powerhouse" of the country, containing their resources. She also says how Syria is now rubble and how they want to block any economic or reconstruction assistance, among other things. Aaron Mate Article - https://mate.substack.com/p/to-keep-troops-in-syria-us-leaders Jimmy Dore Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnhMTfwGAx0&t=775s Senate Committee on Foreign Relations holds hearing on US security in the Middle East - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXUrynJ06kY&t=1950s Syria in the Gray Zone CSIS Min 15 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFsFOS5Odno CSIS Donors - https://www.csis.org/programs/support/our-donors John Kerry Leaked Tape Min 25 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4phB-_pXDM Quote in written form - https://www.truthovercomfort.co.uk/post/the-management-of-savagery-by-max-blumenthal

"AUTHORITY- The President is authorized to use all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any person described in subsection (b) who is being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court." In this video we discuss how the US has signed under law, they can use "any means necessary" to break out officials being charged or detained by the International Criminal Court, in the Netherlands. American service-members' protection act - Wiki American service-members' protection act - Gov John Bolton threatens war crimes court with sanctions in virulent attack

With the way branding works and subsidiary companies, the original company can become mystified, some companies make it more obvious it is their product/brand and some are just tiny writing on the back of the product. Even with some companies having their name on it, you can often miss it, as I have for so many years, because you only look at the big bright brand name, even when the company has used their branding colour like Cadbury. I am sure some people will think it is naive not to know certain brands are owned by certain companies, but how few companies own the majority of brands, is quite shocking. How many consumers know one of people's favourite soft drink companies, owns Costa or a food company owns Primark? Growing up as a kid each type of crisps represents a different company in your head, Quavers, Skips, Doritos, Pringles etc, but in the real world, this is of course not the case. The main point of the article is to highlight how few companies in their industry, own the majority of brands and the problems that come with that. This is not a comprehensive detailing of all sections of the supermarket, just certain subsections, however, if you went into a smaller shop like One Stop, Premier or Co-op, they represent a lot of products. Products you may have thought were competitors, are actually owned by the same companies. PepsiCo and The Coca-Cola Company (US) PepsiCo is of course most well known for its drink Pepsi, the competitor to The Coca-Cola Company's, Coke. What most people do not know, is that both of these corporations own far more drinks than you may have thought, and ones you probably assumed were direct competitors to both these drinks. They both also go beyond soft drinks. We will start with PepsiCo, created in 1965 after a merger with Frito-Lay but its origins go back to 1898. The corporation has grown enormously over the years, with net revenue of $79,474 Billion in 2021 and a net income of $7,679 Billion. (Page 10) PepsiCo owns two subsidiary companies that make many renowned products in our supermarkets, Frito-Lay and Quakers Oats Company. The first subsidiary makes Lays, Walkers, Doritos, Cheetos, Ruffles and more. This is where you can get lost further in subsections of brands, as Walkers who UK readers are extremely aware of, make Walkers standard crisps but also, Wotsits, French Fries, Bugles, Monster Munch, Squares, Quavers and Max. It is strange to believe that such beloved British Crisps, sponsored by English Footballer Gary Lineker, is a brand inside of a subsidiary of a company most people only associate with the drink Pepsi. Another subsidiary of PepsiCo, Quakers Oats Company, is most notorious for its porridge oats, but they also make Granola, Chewy Granola Bars, Rice Cakes and Gatorade. PepsiCo is also partnered with Unilever on the ready-made Lipton Drink and with Starbucks for drinks like Frappuccino's, Doubleshot espresso and more. PepsiCo also sells the Smoothie, Naked and owns 7up everywhere except the US, where Keurig Dr Pepper Inc own it. The Coca-Cola Company was created in 1892 and the drink was formulated in 1886 making it older than Pepsi and PepsiCo. Although is older than PepsiCo, it is financially smaller by net revenue ($38.7 Billion) in 2021 but has a bigger net income of $10.3 Billion. The Corporation operates in over 200 countries and territories, with over 200 brands, which is remarkable. Where most people might have thought 7up was a rival to Cola drinks, it is instead owned by them, much like Sprite and Fanta are owned by Coca-Cola. This is alongside other drinks, such as Appletiser, Coca-Cola, Fresca, Powerade and Schweppes. Again much like PepsiCo owning Naked, the Smoothie brand, Coca-Cola owns Innocent (Smoothies), they also own Ades (Soy Milk), and Glaceau (Vitamin Water, Smart Water). Coca-Cola Company also owns ready-made alcoholic drinks like Jack Daniels Old time Coca-Cola and owns the company Topo Chico (Mexican), which makes Topo Chico Hard Seltzer. If this was not crazy already, they also one up PepsiCo's partnership with Starbucks, by outright owning the Costa Coffee Chain, the biggest coffee chain in the UK. They bought them in 2019 from Whitbread PLC, the owner of the UK’s biggest hotel chain, Premier Inn, as well as restaurant brands, Beefeater, Brewers Fayre, Table Table and Bar + Block. Where Coca-Cola has Costa, Innocent, Coke, Sprite, Fanta and Powerade, PepsiCo has Starbucks drinks, Naked, Pepsi, 7up and Gatorade, on top of the massive reach into other brands, all between just two Corporations. They almost replicate each other for each section, Cola, Lemonade, Coffee, Smoothies and Energy drinks. Mondelez international And Mars Inc (US) Although Mondelez International routes go back to 1923, its current form began in 2012 after Kraft Foods split its company into two, a snack-food company and a grocery company. The Corporations net revenue in 2021 was $28,720 Billion and a net income of $4.56 Billion (Page 1,2), it operates in over 80 countries and has products in over 150 countries around the world. Some of its biggest brands and subsidiaries are Cadbury, Toblerone, Oreo, Belvita, Barni, Philadelphia, Ritz, Tuc (India) and LU. Owning Cadbury is again a spiderweb of products most people would not expect to go further than a UK company, to a US Corporation and much like Walkers, just how many products that brand sells. Cadbury sells of course Dairy Milk, but also Fry, Turkish Delight, Boost, Bournville, Chomp, Crunchie, Curly-Wurly, Double Decker, Flake, Fudge, Picnic, Twirl, Wispa, Brunch, Freddo, Dairy Milk Oreo, Marvelous Creations and the selection box Roses. How many people knew Turkish Delight, which is made by J. S. Fry & Sons, Ltd is owned by Cadbury, which is owned by Mondelez? With Whispa and Twirl, you may have picked up it is Cadbury by the purple, or even on Fudge and Crunchie the slither of purple, but I am sure a few on that list, you were not aware of. Of course, the selection box you might get at Christmas, could have led you to know already. Although Mondelez owns a lot of products down the snack aisle, Mars Inc is much bigger. Mars's history goes all the way back to 1910 when the founder was making and selling butter cream candy from his kitchen in Tacoma, Washington. Mars Inc is not only a snack-producing company but also a pet product and a manager of Animal Hospitals, through their 2017 acquisition of VCA. Mars Inc annual sales in 2021 were $45 billion beating Coca-Cola and Mondelez. Some of Mars's biggest and maybe unknown brands are Milky Way, M&M, Skittles, Snickers, Twix, Bounty, Celebrations and Galaxy, a rival to Dairy Milk. Their showcasing of their hand in the product is much more hidden and I do not think most people or UK citizens realise how big they are. Mars owns the Wrigley Company, which existed before Mars, making gum products like Hubba Bubba, Extra, Juicy Fruit, Spearmint, Winter Fresh and Orbit. Other Mars and Wrigley food products include Mars, Maltesers, Starburst, Bens Original and more. Its pet products include Whiskas, Banfield Pet Hospital, Cesar, Pedigree and many more. Nestle (Swiss) Nestle in its current form goes back to 1905 but its history begins in 1866, with the foundation of the Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. Similar to Mars it is involved in cereals and chocolate but also pet care. Its net revenue for 2021 was $87.1 Billion and a net income of $7.2 Billion (Page 6), making it one of the most profitable corporations in its industry. It has many renowned names like Nesquik, Cheerios, Lion Cereals, Aero, KitKat, Milkybar, Quality Streets, Smarties, Nescafé, Nespresso, and Starbucks Coffee at home, Hot pockets, and Haagen Daaz. Its pet food products are under the subsidiary Nestlé Purina Petcare (US) and have well-known brands like Felix, Fancy Feast, Bakers and many more. It also has a 20.1% Stake in L'oreal, a Hair and Beauty Company that sells many well-known brands and is the world leader in Beauty. Kellogg's (US) In the year 1889 when William Keith Kellogg, and his brother, Dr John Harvey Kellogg, accidentally flaked wheat berries creating the household name Kellogg's. W.K kept experimenting until he flaked corn, and created Corn Flakes. The company was started in 1906 and has grown massively over the century, reaching a net revenue of $14.2 Billion in 2021 and a net income of $1.5 Billion (Page 56) and operates in 180 countries. Notable brands by Kellogg's are Coco Pops, Corn flakes, Crunchy Nut, Frosties, Crunch Nut, Nutri grain, Pop Tarts, Eggo (Waffles), Rice Crispies, Rice crispy squares, Special K, Pringles, Club, Groot Loops, Krave and All Bran. Kellogg's bought Pringles from Procter & Gamble for $2.695 billion, making Kellogg's the world's second-largest savoury snacks player in 2012. Unilever (UK) Unilever is one of the biggest corporations in Britain, with dozens of brand names you find in your house, from the kitchen to the bathrooms. In 1929, Unilever was formed by a merger of the Dutch Margarine Unie and British soapmaker Lever Brothers. Unilever's net revenue in 2021 was £52.4 Billion and its net income was £6.6 Billion, making it another massive corporation in this industry. The most well-known food brands are Ben and Jerry, Carte d'Or Ice Cream, CIF, Coleman's, Magnum, Marmite, Cornetto, Hellman's, Pot Noodle, Vienetta and Walls. Its personal care and beauty products include Comfort, Domestos, Dove, Lifebuoy, Lynx, Persil, Radox, Simple, Sure, Surf, Tresemme and Vaseline. In both sections of the supermarket, it owns massive names and has brands in over 190 countries, operating over 400 brands, with just 13 brands earning them over 1 billion in 2021. It made 7 billion in ice cream sales alone. Other mentions of big companies that have many brands in our supermarkets are Danone (French) who sell bottled water brands such as Evian and Volvic. They are also well known for their yoghurt-based brands like Actively, Activa, Danone, Silk and Actimel. Associated British Food (UK) are a massive company that sells brands such as Abbotts Bakery AB Sugar, Blue Dragon, Kingsmill, Mazola, Pataks, Ploughmans Bakery, Ryvita, Trident and British Sugar. As well as products you find in your house, they also own Primark, making them a force in the retail industry. General Mills (US) produces many kinds of cereal and brands seen in the UK, but especially US Isles, such as Bugles, Cheerios, Coco Puffs, Cookie Crisps, Haagen Daaz, Monster Cereals Count Chocula, Old El Paso, Frankenberry, Lucky Charms and Trix. Conclusion You might wonder why this matters, and what is the big deal. The issue is, that these companies keep growing because they own so many of the big brand's shoppers buy and it becomes a game of hungry hippos, where every time a brand or company starts to grow, they are eaten up by a much bigger one. Meaning it becomes harder for smaller, or family-grown businesses to make their mark on the market, as our stores are dominated by a very small amount of companies. Such few companies having a near monopoly on certain markets can lead to things like price fixing, to artificially inflate prices in a cartel-like fashion. Consumer product giants Unilever and Procter & Gamble (P&G) were fined 315m euros (£280m, $456m) for fixing washing powder prices in eight European countries. The BBC said, "The fines were discounted by 10% after the two admitted running a cartel." The Autorité de la concurrence France's national competition regulator also fined them for concerted practices. The companies "met regularly and secretly to coordinate their commercial policies and discuss their pricing policies." If there were not such few companies that dominate certain product areas, this would not have been possible. It becomes a game of monopoly where the market is further consolidated by fewer companies, who operate on a multinational level, with multinational shareholders, with little care for the common consumer. Often many of the big corporations actually have the same shareholders, which raises big problems, but that will be discussed later in the series. You do not want a small number of companies, with such reach to influence medical advice, governments, regulations, pricing and people, through constant advertising. The bigger corporations get, the bigger leverage they have over governments to limit criminal cases and to cover their records when it comes to worker maltreatment. Naturally, the bigger the network of the company and the more countries it operates in, makes it significantly harder to keep oversight of local producers in other countries, who may have questionable laws on workers' rights. You also may not want to fund certain companies for ethical reasons, but without knowing it, in a completely different product area, you are still buying from the same company. I believe everyone should have the choice to eat or drink these products, but much like cigarettes, advertising, constant promotion and sponsorships make it all too easy to end up buying the product, as it is implanted in your mind. An Oxfam investigation found "most cocoa farmers and workers live below the poverty line, earning less than $2 a day" and many "cocoa-growing areas have high rates of hunger and malnutrition." Nestle's website even states "cultivating cocoa presents numerous challenges, like deforestation, child labour risks and a lack of living incomes for cocoa farming households." I am under no illusion that any company would have similar issues, as Cocoa is only grown in certain countries and needs to be imported, however, the massive influx of money these few giants make from their cocoa-based products, means they should put much more pressure on local farmers, or have employees stationed their to oversee operations. I understand it is extremely hard to manage local farmers, of a completely different culture but at the end of the day, that amount of cocoa is being imported to produce their products, which is plastered in every shop and TV, which increases the demand, which in turn increases the supply need. Each company will have marketing teams, who do everything they can, to make sure people and children are pushed to buy their product, whether it is the packaging, the name, colour, seasonal twists and advertisements by channel and time. This in turn leads to an increased need for more workers, who are then underpaid to produce most likely an over-supply demand, especially in the US and UK, where Obesity is a normal passing of life. I am sure the problem is much harder to solve, than my simplified and limited suggestions, but the companies should feel responsibility to minimise these problems, as much as they realistically can. (Which they say they are trying to do through certain initiatives) Of course, you can choose who you want to buy from and do your homework on the owners of common brands, but until you realise just how many brands these companies own, you will most likely be unaware. You may also see no problem with it, which is fine, it is not evil in nature, but knowing the depth of their products causes concern for the continued practice of such few companies having so much market power, earning billions a year. As much as most people want to buy from local producers, such low prices from massive companies, make it hard not to buy from them, myself included. A lot of these companies and brands started as local, family businesses but were either bought up or became the ones buying up companies they used to be. It is virtually impossible for a new company wanting to grow, as the players are already set and understandably they will want to cash in, if they are made an offer, who wouldn't? The great thing about small companies or sellers is the main focus is on the quality of the product, rather than the product purely being about profit for them or their shareholders. It is also easier to track the product, it benefits the local community, rather than foreign multinationals and encourages a trend of local buying. The next articles will mostly be a continuation of showing how most brands or thought of companies, are owned by a handful of multinational corporations in most industries. Due to a lot of these brands being sugary ones, some of the issues will differ. I eat and drink some of these companies products, like 99% of people and will most likely continue to, but at least it might make me think to try an alternative, or minimise my use of them where not needed. You cannot always buy local, or from a small business and just because they are a big company, does not make them inherently bad, or offer no good, but knowledge of them is always useful in your future decision making. Some of the below brands are out of date as this is an Oxfam Infographic from 2014. The article was called "These 10 companies make a lot of the food we buy. Here’s how we made them better. "December 10, 2014, By Anna Kramer. The infographic was the reason I decided to do this series.

I am sure the US, UK, NATO, Militaries, Big Oil, Arms Corporations and other governments fund foreign policy think tanks, because they love their neutral, critical analyses. I am sure corporations who look to squeeze every buck, fund these think tanks, because they are rabid readers of every report, for every think tank they fund. I am sure it does not effect the writing bias of their employees! Governments do not have a history of silencing dissent, or squashing investigations. Funding Atlantic Council CSIS ASPI IISS RUSI Chatham House RAND

"As requested by Chief of Operations, Cuba Project, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are to indicate brief but precise description of pretexts which they consider would provide Justification for US military intervention in Cuba." "We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized." In this video, I read and discuss sections from the 1962 Operation Northwoods document, which is about creating sophisticated artificial pretexts to invade Cuba. This involves false flags, staged events, mock funerals and whipping up public and international opinion. Among many other things, of course. Operation Northwoods Document Wikipedia Bay of Pigs

Over nine years -- from 1964 to 1973 -- the United States dropped more than two million tons of bombs on Laos -- more than they dropped on Germany and Japan combined during all of World War II. It made Laos, per person, the most heavily bombed country in history. As one Laotian said, the “bombs fell like rain.” Villages and entire valleys were obliterated. The ancient Plain of Jars was devastated. Countless civilians were killed. https://www.truthovercomfort.co.uk/post/killing-hope-by-william-blum Obama Laos Press Release - https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/09/06/remarks-president-obama-people-laos Video format - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0KB0NT3Yvs LAOTIAN REPORTS COMMUNIST DRIVE By Malcolm W. Browne Special to The New York Times Feb. 23, 1973 - https://www.nytimes.com/1973/02/23/archives/laotian-reports-communist-drive-premier-says-offensive-was-launched.html Times Machine - https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1973/02/23/issue.html# Operation Barrel Roll - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barrel_Roll Map -https://www.google.com/maps/place/Asia/@19.9740391,99.7775473,5.21z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x3663f18a24cbe857:0xa9416bfcd3a0f459!8m2!3d34.047863!4d100.6196553

The Government can request the Media to not publish certain information that poses a "national security threat", through D Notices. MI6, Mi5 and GCHQ are exempt from the Freedom of information act, exemplifying the secrecy of our intelligence agencies, even the CIA can be Foia'd. The media and government officials regularly meet, including prime ministers and heads of the media, like Rupert Murdoch. Boris Johnson on the 21/09/2020 met with 8 different media groups. Why we refused to comply with the D-Notice committee (declassifieduk.org) D Notice (DSMA) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSMA-Noticehttps://www.dsma.uk/ David Cameron makes veiled threat to media over NSA and GCHQ leaks The Guardian - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/28/david-cameron-nsa-threat-newspapers-guardian-snowden David Cameron Speech EU Council Volume 569: debated on Monday 28 October 2013 - https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-10-28/debates/1310285000001/EUCouncilPress Gazette Article - https://pressgazette.co.uk/rupert-murdochs-news-corp-met-ministers-40-times-in-first-14-months-of-johnson-government/ Cabinet Office: ministers' transparency publications - https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/ministers-transparency-publications#2020 Leader of the House of Commons and Whips’ meetings, July to September 2020 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/958312/Leader-of-the-House-of-Commons-and-Whips_-meetings-July-to-September-2020.csv/preview Cabinet Office ministerial meetings, July to September 2020 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/958323/Cabinet-Office-ministerial-meetings-July-to-September-2020.csv/preview Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP meetings, July to September 2020 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/958306/Rt-Hon-Boris-Johnson-MP-meetings-July-to-September-2020.csv/preview MOD Document - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/760575/07513.pdf FOIA Laws - https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guidance-index/freedom-of-information-and-environmental-information-regulations/section-23-security-bodies/

In this video I discuss a few research shortcuts to help you save time. Download free eBooks and pdf's - https://z-lib.org/ PDF to Searchable converter - PDF to Text converter https://www.pdf2go.com/ https://archive.org/ Google Books - https://books.google.co.uk/books?uid=116572316526565456704&hl=en Image to text converter - https://www.prepostseo.com/image-to-text

Due to the amount of times whilst researching I came across websites with quotes but absolutely no evidence to back it up, I began to create my own resources containing the quotes, the sources and the links. This website gives you the wealth of sourced information I have collected and presents it in the most simple manner I could. The quotes are categorised into the genres I feel suits them the best, the overall theme of the website being historical and under discussed events in the mainstream. The topics concerned are the War on Terror, globalisation, supranational entities, Colonialism funding of revelations, coups, historical events and more. The other aspect of the website is the cheat sheets I have created, the intent being for the people who are interested in these subjects and taking away the excuses by providing the legwork for them. I know how frustrating and time consuming it can be to hunt down certain verifiable information in books, so I hope this website can help future researchers and give people enough of a look of bits in the book to want to buy it. In this video I go through my website and explain how it is extremely useful for researchers and readers.